A two-wheeler rider in Bengaluru has compiled an astonishing ₹1.61 lakh in site visitors fines but continues to navigate town streets, prompting frustration amongst native residents and elevating questions concerning the effectiveness of site visitors enforcement within the space.
The difficulty got here to mild after an X (previously Twitter) person, recognized as Shibam, shared a publish detailing the rider’s ongoing violations of site visitors guidelines. Shibam reported that the overall fines had surged from ₹1,05,500 final 12 months to the present ₹1,61,000, highlighting the rider’s disregard for rules, together with using with out a helmet.
The publish featured pictures of the car and the rider, together with a screenshot from the Visitors Challan Fee app displaying the collected fines.
In a response to the net outcry, the Bengaluru Visitors Police acknowledged the scenario on X, stating, “Famous, we’ll take essential motion.”
Residents have expressed their disbelief on the lack of motion taken towards the rider, with one person questioning why the car had not but been seized regardless of the escalating fines. Feedback on the publish mirrored a rising concern over site visitors enforcement, with some customers suggesting that the fines might quickly exceed the car’s worth, main the rider to desert it. Others advocated for stricter measures, together with submitting a First Data Report (FIR) and pursuing fines via the courts.
One person mocked, “Very quickly the high quality quantity will exceed the scooter worth and he’ll abandon the car.”
One other stated, “Perhaps the police is investing in that man. 50% return in a single 12 months beats NIFTY50 palms down 
Time to understand your income @BlrCityPolice“
The scenario has ignited a broader dialog about site visitors violations in Bengaluru, with customers expressing frustration over the perceived inaction from authorities. One person famous, “They don’t seem to be taking it significantly. I personally posted site visitors violators in public two months in the past, and it is nonetheless open. In the event that they mistakenly mark it solved, violations can be booked once more.”
