Former That ’70s Present actor Danny Masterson is blaming his trial lawyer for his 2023 rape convictions and accusing his defence workforce of “failure of due diligence.”
Masterson, at the moment serving 30 years to life in jail for raping two girls, filed a petition for habeas corpus — a authorized motion difficult the lawfulness of his imprisonment — on Monday, which blamed his trial lawyer, Philip Cohen, for failing to name any witnesses and for not pushing again on prosecutors’ claims about Scientology, Selection studies.
Masterson, 49, “implored (Cohen) to current not less than a minimal modicum of protection proof, however counsel refused,” in keeping with the submitting.
“Cohen had a longstanding aversion to presenting affirmative protection proof within the instances he tried,” the submitting mentioned.
“He personally spoke to solely two of the greater than 20 potential witnesses who had been strongly beneficial by co-counsel Karen Goldstein and investigator Lynda Larsen. He wrote off the nice majority of them with none private contact, however their manifestly exculpatory prior statements to the police and to investigators.”
Within the petition, Masterson additionally alleges police and prosecutors had been prejudiced in opposition to Scientology, partially because of the involvement of former Scientologist Leah Remini, who supported his accusers publicly.
“She was welcomed into the prosecution fold as an adviser, strategist, authoritative arbiter on the coverage and practices of the Church of Scientology, and advocate for the complaining witnesses,” mentioned the petition. “She was welcomed though the LAPD knew that she had an ongoing vendetta in opposition to petitioner.”
The actor was discovered responsible of two of three counts of forcible rape throughout his retrial in Could 2023. He had pleaded not responsible to the costs in opposition to him. The retrial was known as after 2022’s unique trial on the identical three counts led to a mistrial when a jury deadlocked, failing to succeed in unanimous verdicts.
Get each day Nationwide information
Get the day’s prime information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
Through the second trial, deputy district legal professional Reinhold Mueller and his workforce tried to color Masterson as a serial rapist who had been protected by high-ranking officers within the Church of Scientology. (Masterson and his household are all members of the church.) They claimed Masterson, on separate events, put medication into the drinks of a longtime girlfriend and two different girls he knew by way of the church earlier than he raped them.
The victims claimed Scientology officers threatened them for years after they reported Masterson’s abuse to police. The Church of Scientology has denied all accusations of wrongdoing and was not a celebration in Masterson’s trial.
On the retrial, prosecutors known as Claire Headley to the stand. She is an ex-Scientologist who testified that the church requires particular permission to go to authorities.
Based on the brand new submitting, the church’s legal professionals urged Cohen to name Hugh Whitt, a longtime Scientologist, to talk to the declare, however Cohen and his co-counsel didn’t name him.
“Why have we heard a lot about Scientology?” Cohen requested in his closing argument as an alternative of rebutting Headley’s declare. “May it’s there’s issues in any other case with the federal government’s case?”
The petition argues that Cohen didn’t interview quite a few defence witnesses who might need helped Masterson’s case by difficult the credibility of his accusers.
“This failure of due diligence violated the well-settled precept of Sixth Modification case legislation that an legal professional should interview potential protection witnesses as a mandatory basis for making a reasoned resolution about trial technique,” the petition added.
“In sum, the jury noticed solely the tip of the iceberg of obtainable protection proof within the type of the complaining witnesses’ inconsistent statements whereas the wealth of immediately exculpatory proof went unused for no viable tactical purpose.”
Masterson’s appellate lawyer, Eric Multhaup, claims that the jury “heard solely half the story – the prosecution’s aspect.”
“The unfairness of the second Masterson trial was the results of prosecutorial misconduct, judicial bias and the failure of protection counsel to current exculpatory proof,” Multhaup mentioned in a press release to the Los Angeles Occasions on Monday. “The habeas corpus petition is accompanied by 65 displays that doc the proof of innocence that might have been offered, however was not.
“Danny deserves a brand new trial the place the jury can hear his aspect as nicely.”
Masterson’s legal professionals filed a separate attraction final December, alleging that key witness testimonies morphed over time and “faulty judicial rulings” skewed the jury’s view of the proof in opposition to him.
In a press release posted to the Cliff Gardner legislation places of work web site, the legal professionals mentioned there have been “two basic flaws” in Masterson’s convictions, one being the aforementioned skewed view and the second a “gorgeous quantity” of alleged exculpatory proof “by no means offered to the jury.”
His authorized workforce went on to say that these are solely “one half” of their deliberate problem to his convictions, and they’re working in the direction of Masterson’s “full exoneration.”
— With information from The Related Press
© 2025 World Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
