The order, denying Fox’s motion for summary judgment and granting in part its motion for summary judgment as to certain elements of the complaint, is here; it’s 130 pages long and I probably won’t have time to go through the whole thing and digest it anytime soon, but I thought I’d pass it along. However, an excerpt on the falsity of the underlying statements (emphasis in the original):
While the Court must view the record in the light most favorable to Fox, the record does not demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to falsity. By its voluminous showing, Dominion has met its burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to the falsity. Fox therefore had the burden of proving that an issue of material fact existed. Fox failed to carry his burden. The evidence adduced in this civil proceeding shows that CRYSTAL it is clear that none of the statements related to Dominion about the 2020 election are true. Therefore, the Court will grant summary judgment in favor of Dominion based on the element of falsity.